Talk:Linear interpolation

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics High‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics High This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

(x-x0)/(x1-x0) is not the SLOPE! slope is rate of change in something. that is, it must have different units in numerator and denominator (ie, meters per second; rise/run; bps; etc). So it's misleading to call it slope. That, or i've gone crazy in the years since taking math classes.

You're not crazy, the page was wrong. Good catch. —Blotwell 10:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The alphas are only equal when the slope of the line you're trying to interpolate is one. Otherwise, they're not. --Herbchronic 00:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please explain. To me, the article seems correct on this account. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

The article is correct: interpolation coefficient is different than slope

"It can be proven using Rolle's theorem that if f has two continuous derivatives, the error is bounded by..." I just tried this and it can't work. You have to use the mean value theorem, not Rolle's theorem - J Fellows, University of Birmingham

The proof I know uses Rolle's theorem. This proof is for polynomial interpolation in general, not just linear interpolation. It's in Atkinson's Introduction to Numerical Analysis, and also in Suli and Mayers' book with the same title. However, the proof uses some algebraic manipulations and the difference between Rolle's theorem and the mean value theorem is just one small step, so it's well possible that it's better to appeal to the mean value theorem. I wouldn't mind if you changed it. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 03:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Does "has two continuous derivatives" mean "has continuous first and second derivatives"? This does not say what it means, because "derivative" is ambiguous A well-behaved function f has one derivative (derivative function) and an infinite number of derivatives (of values of the derivative function at each point of its domain). — Paul G (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, "has two continuous derivatives" means "has continuous first and second derivatives". It's the only interpretation that makes sense, so I don't think it's really ambiguous. It's also a fairly common way to put it, but perhaps rather informal and I can see that it will confuse readers, so I changed it. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

can someone update the figure? the thumbnail that's used has (xy,) instead of (x,y) but the figure itself is fine, and I can't figure out how to fix this. Very confusing. Also, I think it would be more illustrative if the the point, (x,y), were not close to the midpoint of the line segment. If I don't see a fix for this in a few days I'll simply create a new figure. 108.6.2.66 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC).Reply

It has to be a bug with the program Wikipedia is using to produce PNGs from SVGs. We may hope it will be fixed by itself when the bug is fixed and the PNG updated. --Berland (talk) 19:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The figure is still wrong...something new about the bug fix? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.26.194.33 (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

It says "bilinear interpolation can be accomplished in two lerps", but I think it requires 3 lerps -- e.g., two in x direction and one in y direction. Can someone verify that and correct it? -Markg17 (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

RGBA color space refers to this article when explaining the etymology of 'alpha' in the alpha channel, citing the formula "αA + (1-α)B" - yet it doesn't appear here. (20040302 (talk))

Is it correct usage? Isn't distance in this case understood as diagonal length? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.20.191.37 (talk) 20:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and have changed it to "horizontal length". Cai (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Where does the factor of 8 come from in

${\displaystyle |R_{T}|\leq {\frac {(x_{1}-x_{0})^{2}}{8}}\max _{x_{0}\leq x\leq x_{1}}|f''(x)|}$ ?

According to Taylor's theorem the remainder should be of the form

${\displaystyle R_{k}(x)={\frac {f^{(k+1)}(\xi _{L})}{(k+1)!}}(x-a)^{k+1}}$

which for ${\displaystyle k=1}$ (linear interpolation) is

${\displaystyle R_{k}(x)={\frac {f''(x-a)}{2!}}(x-a)^{2}}$

and so setting ${\displaystyle a=x_{0}}$ and taking the maximum over ${\displaystyle x}$, the factor in the denominator of the above should be 2?

Itsacommon (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply