Talk:Lily van Java

	Lily van Java has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 25, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 25, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 1928's Lily of Java was the first Chinese-produced film in Indonesia?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Silent / Southeast Asian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Silent films task force. This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force. Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lily van Java/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this one. Cheers, TBrandley 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

• Infobox: Add actors per production section
  • Not done exactly as you suggested, but noted
• Lede: film. En-dash should be em-dash after that "film"
  • Either is acceptable, per WP:MDASH.
• Lede: "Details on its cast and performance are contradictory, although the film is recognised as the first of a long series of ethnic Chinese-produced films in the country". Any reference?
  • In #Release and reception, but I'll cite as well.
• Lede: "It is likely lost." → "It is likely a lost film."
  • Done
• Premise: Wow, very small. Any way of expanding?
  • I'll take another look, but I don't have high hopes. Pareh had the same issue.
    • Nothing in Biran or Said; Biran just adds "the film had a simple story and showed a lot of tennis" and Said quotes an earlier work by Biran which says the same thing.
• Production: Missing comma before "respectively"
  • Done.
• Production: "General Motors" is missing "(GM)" at the end, as per MOS:ACRO
  • Not done, as the acronym is not actually used.
• References: "Footnotes" and "Bibliography" should be actual sub-sections per MOS:ACCESS.
  • Done.

Though the article is small, because its lost, its still pretty solid. That's all above. On hold for now. TBrandley 02:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK. This article looks good. It'll pass. Congrats. TBrandley 14:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

• Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply