| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Library of Congress Classification article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This page is laid out and designed as part of a set of pages. To discuss the set as a whole, see Wikipedia talk:Contents. For more information on Wikipedia's contents system as a whole, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Contents. |
Comment is needed on the wide spread use of the system, e.g. it is used extensivly in UK academic and research libraries, and no doubt other places too. PaddyBasher (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Pppery: Why do you think including the table is appropriate? Logoshimpo (talk) 23:39, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
mainly in the fact that five classes (I, O, W, X, and Y) lack any assignment to topicsmeaningless. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:41, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.