Talk:Lactalis

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

Talk:Lactalis

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lactalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

French-language version of the article has more details

An editor with time and inspiration on their hands might expand this article by translating text, and copying citations, from the more detailed French-language version of this article. Acwilson9 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content removal by User:Cortador

User:Cortador has removed a large chunk of content from this page without discussion. As they have not provided an argument for why the content should be removed I cannot offer a rebuttal other than to say that their statement that "none of these products has coverage that warrants inclusion" is unsupported and insufficient to warrant the removal of useful information. Tiggum (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have provided an argument: without non-primary coverage, including a list like this isn't justified. This isn't a product catalogue. Cortador (talk) 05:57, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

RfC about the removal of international subsidiary brands

Should the article contain lists of and information about the company's international brands? Tiggum (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Tiggum: Why do you need an RfC to answer that question? Polygnotus (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
(Invited randomly by a bot) If there are no reliable, independent sources for these brands, lack of notability is a good reason to exclude such detail. Jojalozzo (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is no need for an RFC for such a simple situation: begin with a discussion on the talk page with the other user. Try to reach a consensus. Try third-party WP:3O. Going to an RFC a this point wastes resources. Please revert your RFC. WP:NOTBURONeonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 00:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC) -Reply
Please assume good faith. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 00:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Maybe don't summon me if you're not actually doing an RfC? Benjamin (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I don't know what that means. I did my best to figure out what the correct procedure would be but it all seems very complicated. I just want to preserve the useful information that used to be on this page. Tiggum (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.