Talk:Kim Ruff

(PamD) Thank you for your help. I am still confused about the inline citations. It appears that with help, the citations have been corrected or improved. The re

Talk:Kim Ruff

No inline citations and citations done improperly

(PamD) Thank you for your help. I am still confused about the inline citations. It appears that with help, the citations have been corrected or improved. The related articles are support for the body of my article and the verification can be found in the links at the bottom. Can you insert where you would like to see inline citations? Thanks so much. Also it appears that my page is on review for deletion after 7 years and I am very baffled by that. My goal is to improve the article as required. Thanks so much.(Millionaire10 (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)) (PamD) If your comments were deleted they were done so in error. I am not very versed on Wiki yet. I am just trying to manage my own page and correct these newly found problems after having the page for over 7 years with no issues. I do see your concern about inline citations and citations done improperly. I will work to address those while formatting this information correctly on here. Since you are requesting this be done, can you provide and example of what you would like to see corrected in terms of inline citations and citations done correctly? I will be glad to comply. Thanks (Millionaire10 (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC))Reply

This page seems relevant to keep but needs cleaned up. Actaudio (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

(Actaudio) I am diligently trying to identify what is needed after 7 years of having this page in existence. I now have to clean up this page and to maneuver and remedy the fresh issues is a bit problematic but I am working on it. Please be specific with your reference to clean it up. Thanks (Millionaire10 (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC))Reply

(Millionaire10) I see multiple articles in the references but there’s no citations within the text to those references. You’ll need to highlight the text in the article then select the “cite” button at the top. If you want to use an existing reference, there’s an option for “existing” so you just have to select the reference. If you did it right, you’ll see a small number after the text. Just look at any other Wikipedia page and you’ll see what it looks like. I know this isnt explained super clearly and there’s a learning curve to Wikipedia for sure. I see this page is flagged for deletion but I’ll make a comment on the discussion page that you’re working on it. Someone else might be able to step in to help, also. Actaudio (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.