Talk:Kill Dil

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Use me. I am a talk page. Discuss and obtain WP consensus before vandalizing and deleting whole stuff or declaring any source not reliable based on your own assumptions. Please cooperate and do not edit war or engage others. Use me please Esatesa (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is the person inserting content who is required to establish that the links they are providing have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy and are not merely some guy's website or a PR firm or a tabloid. And we are not a celebrity gossip page to have promotional teaser language when describing films, we state the facts. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

None of language used was promotional. Again reverted by you with out obtaining WP consensus and proving your personal point of view i.e. reliable Vs unreliable. If Times of india is not reliable then what is reliable? Esatesa (talk) 02:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

1) "Music of the movie comes out as a big winner." and "and here is twist in the life" are in fact promotional. 2) You are not using TOI. 3) you are using non reliable sources /www.bollywoodlife.com and http://extraasearch.com/ YOU are the one who needs to establish consensus for your proposal. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your proposals 1) "Music of the movie comes out as a big winner." REMOVED and "and here is twist in the life" are in fact promotional. REMOVED 2) You are not using TOI. NOW USED 3) you are using non reliable sources /www.bollywoodlife.com and http://extraasearch.com/ BOTH REMOVED. YOU are the one who needs to establish consensus for your proposal. DEVELOPED. Thanks Esatesa (talk) 15:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sougata rc99 (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dev (Ranveer) and Tutu (Ali) were two orphans who had been brought up by a local goon Bhaiyaji (Govinda) who trained them to be killers.Dev met Disha(Parineeti) & Dev fells for her and started bunking his work (which was killing people) and Tutu kept covering for him. But not for long. Bhaiyaji soon discovered the truth.Dev left that job & took job in a insurance company.Bhaiyaji tried his best to bring back his Dev.Now Dev was in dilemma that if he choose bhaiyaji's work and Disha came to know about Dev's past then she would leave him.On otherside,if Dev tried to leave Bhaiyaji's job then Bhaiyaji would kill him.Now whom did Dev choose and how did he manage his life were rest of the story.

Not done for now: Protection expires in less than 48 hours. At that time feel free to edit and discuss changes to the Plot section. Sam ^Sing! 15:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is a POV push by RedpenofDoom. See the article history for his autocratic Push enforcement also on other bolly wood articles. This is against the spirit of group work for improvement of WP articlesEsatesa (talk) 02:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please do not make accusations about other editors, particularly without providing any evidence.

Regarding your recent edits.

1) per policies, the film itself is a perfectly usable source for the summary of the plot.

2) koimoi is used in thousands of articles, if you dont think it is reliable, you will need to establish such at WP:RSN

3) opinions about whether a particular box office collection are "decent" or "above average" or "greatly exceeded expectations" all need to be attributed to the source making the claim and not presented in Wikipedia's voice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply