This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
Latest comment: 1 year ago10 comments3 people in discussion
This isn't a place for you to argue with each other. Either submit an edit request using {{edit extended-protected}}, or stop posting here.
Hello @Agent VII
as I had provided the all information with correct and real sources, and the article is of Kamboj, and in this article it it only hyping Muslims kambohs, but in the last version all the religions and famous personalities were getting equal hype, so I'm requesting to restore the edit.
--Kambojahistory (talk) Kambojahistory (talk) 04:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Kambojahistory, Try to understand that British Era sources are not considered reliable (WP:RAJ). Sometimes, census data from that period are used, as in this article for being statistical, but are to be replaced whenever possible and typically discouraged. If you are willing to include reliable information, try Google Scholar and Google Books. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:28, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
You are not Kamboj, Kambojs have never claimed to be Rajput. I have read through many sources, you have linked your IG in another thread. You are a Rajput trying to claim Kambojs. Please stop vandalizing the page, we Kambojs have nothing to do with Rajputs. Rajputs do not exist in Indian Punjab or Northern Haryana where we Kambojs live. Kambojs are related to Khatris, Jats and Pashtuns. I have checked the genetic results of Rajputs and Kambojs. We don't even share Haplogroups with them. IndianHistorianMan647582 (talk) 18:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why are you even on Wikipedia if you don't even know anything? I'm not the admin, there's no such thing as an admin on a Wikipedia page. We aren't Rajput, we are Kshatriyas but aren't Rajput. Not all Kshatriyas are Rajput. If you were Kamboj, how come you made an edit citing that Kambojs are low caste who are inferior to Jats without citing references? Please stop citing incomplete references and by the way I've been studying and researching about Kambojs/Kambojas for more than 10 years. I have a ton of references and citations. We aren't Rajput. We are our own unique community, also how can we be Rajput when we existed before them? Rajputisation process barely occurred in Punjab. Please stop vandalizing. IndianHistorianMan647582 (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, for protecting the Kamboj Wikipedia page, it’s been vandalized several times. I have a lot of sources from Google books regarding about Kambojas but not sure if it meets Wikipedia citing standards. IndianHistorianMan647582 (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Request edit
Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I request adding a new subsection under the Demographics section titled (Caste Classification and Rajput Identity) to improve verifiability and align with WP:RAJ and WP:V policies.
Caste Classification and Rajput Identity
The Hindu and Sikh Kamboj communities are officially classified under Rajput subgroups. According to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) Annual Update Report 2022, Kamboj are listed as a Suryavanshi and Agnivanshi Rajput within OBC Classification.[1]
Ethnographic research conducted by the Anthropological Survey of India, as documented in "People of India" by K.S Singh (1996), identifies the Kamboj as a Rajput subgroup linked to Suryavanshi and Raghuvanshi lineages in Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh.[2]
Colonial-era ethnographic works such as "Glossary of Tribes and Castes" by H.A Rose described the Kamboj as a martial community associated with Rajput clans in India.[3]
In contemporary Classifications, the Hindu and some Sikh Kambojs are widely regarded as Rajputs and predominantly identity as Kamboj Rajputs in North India.
Not done In the K. S. Singh reference, I'm not seeing where it says the Kamboj is a Rajput subgroup specifically -- it has a "sections" listing for Kamboj with a bunch of groups, which happen to include Rajput and Suryavanshi and Raghuvanshi, but it doesn't seem like those groups are listed differently or given more importance than the other ~20 listed. The last part of your request posits that a position is "widely regarded" yet offers no references to support that claim. Lastly, the H. A. Rose reference links to a completely different text on archive.org ("Karl Marx Frederick Engles Volume-11 Marx Amp Engels 1851-53"). --tony23:05, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank You for noticing my mistake. I apologize and i'll come soon with the original sources.
Kamboj are oldest khastriya clan and process of rajputnization is done after 8th centuary and mainky in british era . Kamboj are mentioned in Ramayan and Mahabharata and all other literature of vedic history.kambij,sak and yavas does the process of rajputnization.they are elite khastriya of royal lineage. Maytrr of reservations is syaye based that is given to economic backword people mainly those who comes from pakistan after paryitian in 1995 in Haryana to all peoples those and economic backwords not socialy backward. Robinsinghkamboj7 (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
कम्बोज (Kamboj) का उल्लेख प्राचीन भारतीय ग्रंथों जैसे महाभारत, रामायण और कई पुराणों में मिलता है, जहाँ उन्हें एक प्राचीन क्षत्रिय जनजाति के रूप में वर्णित किया गया है।
इतिहासकारों के अनुसार कम्बोजों का संबंध उत्तर-पश्चिम भारत और अफगानिस्तान क्षेत्र से रहा है, और वे वैदिक तथा उत्तर-वैदिक काल से भारतीय सभ्यता का हिस्सा रहे हैं।
बौद्ध धर्म का प्रभाव कई समुदायों पर पड़ा था, लेकिन इससे किसी समुदाय की मूल उत्पत्ति बदल नहीं जाती।
Wikipedia पर जानकारी केवल विश्वसनीय स्रोतों (reliable sources) के आधार पर ही जोड़ी जानी चाहिए। यदि आपके पास कोई प्रमाणित स्रोत है तो कृपया साझा करें, अन्यथा इस प्रकार के दावे शामिल नहीं किए जा सकते। ~2026-25761-42 (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
hello,
As in wikipedias article of Kamadhenu, we can clearly see that kambojas, were originated fron the roar of the sacred cow, and the after the kambojas just migrate from one to other place, thats why they are linked with inranian and many other places, but as hinduism is the oldest religion and in its holy book Ramayana, there is mention of the origin of kambojas, and if anyone thinks that, Ramayana is fictional, so can they prove the satellite image of Ramsetu? ~2026-25778-97 (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 January 2026
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change Devanagari spelling in the lead from कंबोज to कम्बोज.
Explanation:
The correct Devanagari spelling of Kamboj is कम्बोज, which reflects the actual consonant sequence म् + ब (mba) found in the historically attested Sanskrit form Kamboja/Kamboj. In Devanagari, this sequence is properly written as the conjunct म्ब. The currently used spelling कंबोज replaces म् with the dot ं (anusvāra). While this is common in modern Hindi as a shorthand pronunciation-based convention, it is not the precise or etymological spelling of the name. Classical Sanskrit dictionaries and scholarly sources consistently record the form with म्ब, not anusvāra. Since the article lists Devanagari spellings alongside other formal scripts (Nastaliq, Gurmukhi, ALA-LC), the Devanagari form should likewise use the accurate and standard spelling कम्बोज, with कंबोज at most being a modern Hindi variant rather than the canonical form. स्वर्ण (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{subst:EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.
Please consider adding the following sourced information to the Kamboj article:
Ancient Indian literary sources associate the Kambojas with Kshatriya traditions. The Manusmriti (10.43–44) includes the Kambojas among groups described as having originally been Kshatriyas, although the text states that they subsequently became degraded in status through the omission of prescribed rites and Brahmanical practices.
The Vamsha Brahmana of the Samaveda preserves the name Kamboja Aupamanyava in a lineage of Vedic teachers. Kamboja Aupamanyava is presented as a teacher in the succession of Vedic learning.
Sources:
Patrick Olivelle, Manu's Code of Law, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 224–225.
A. A. Macdonell and A. B. Keith, Vedic Index of Names and Subjects, vol. 1, John Murray, 1912, p. 149.
Encyclopaedia Iranica, "Kamboja".
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.