Talk:Jupiter-mass binary object

Recent research suggests that these objects don't exist. Hobbema (talk) 09:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Jupiter-mass binary object

They don't exist

Recent research suggests that these objects don't exist. Hobbema (talk) 09:36, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

added, but because the Nature article is paywalled it's just one sentence for now. Artem.G (talk) 13:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The original paper
However this paper claims that previous models explaining the formation are incorrect, rather than providing evidence against the observations. Johnjbarton (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
There was substantial contestation of the observational results ever since. [1]
It should be highlighted that the original paper on JuMBOs discovery was not accepted for publication yet as all the news cite arxiv article, that is not confirmed as published. Astrotycho (talk) 01:04, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The unpublished source
  • Pearson, Samuel G.; McCaughrean, Mark J. (2 Oct 2023). "Jupiter Mass Binary Objects in the Trapezium Cluster". arXiv:2310.01231 [astro-ph.EP].
should not be summarized and not be cited in support of any claims.
The sources that disputes the observations include
  • Luhman, K. L. (2025). JWST spectra of brown dwarf candidates in the Orion Nebula Cluster. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 542(1), L126-L131.
  • Luhman, K. L. (2024). Candidates for Substellar Members of the Orion Nebula Cluster from JWST/NIRCam∗. The Astronomical Journal, 168(6), 230.
Johnjbarton (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.