Talk:Jimmy Page: Session Man

The corresponding articles of the constituent albums of this series consist almost entirely of track listings, and as such, do not present sufficient informatio

Talk:Jimmy Page: Session Man

Merge with constituent albums

The corresponding articles of the constituent albums of this series consist almost entirely of track listings, and as such, do not present sufficient information to stand individually. They should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion

I strongly object to the propsed deletion of this article by new user FloydRule on the basis that this is a notable album containing examples of Jimmy Page's 1960s session work as documented in the wikipedia article Jimmy Page#Session musician. It is not a bootleg, it was released by Bomp! Records. As for the claim of being "unauthorized", unauthorized by whom? Session musicians are for hire and do not retain any control over recordings they've played on. The album was reviewed by allmusic.com and included in Martin Strong's Essential Rock Discography. It is also mentioned in the book Jimmy Page: Magus, Musician, Man where it is singled out as one of the best collections of Page's session work. Piriczki (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would also like to add that Greg Shaw was one of the most astute and meticulous chronicler of rare '60s rock, the leading example of which is the extensive Pebbles series. And yes, they do secure the rights to use the recordings (the difficulty of which is detailed in the book Bomp! Saving the World One Record at a Time) and the necessity of mastering some tracks from vinyl only points out the extreme rarity of the recordings (see allmusic's review of Pebbles). Piriczki (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Further, this album should not be confused with a similar compilation, a bootleg titled James Patrick Page: Session Man, released by Slipped Disc Records in 1979. Piriczki (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Obviously, the album is notable and should not be deleted.LedRush (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.