Talk:Jetstar

Talk:Jetstar

Requested move 26 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 02:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Jetstar AirwaysJetstar – The Jetstar Airways page should be relocated to Jetstar to fall inline with the common name, just like Tigerair, AirAsia and Scoot. None of these have Airways at the end therefore Jetstar shouldn't either otherwise the others should too Life200BC (talk) 08:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Support Seinsuit (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A321neo?

The fleet section doesn’t list A321neo even though there is a picture provided of one and that Jetstar fly them? 213.165.186.61 (talk) 14:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, you're right. That was actually an Airbus A321LR. I've fixed it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 00:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fleet table

There are a fair number of inconsistencies in the fleet table with the cited sources, but I don't think it's possible to boldly make an edit that fixes everything, it probably needs a bit of thought and discussion, so here goes...

  • A320-200 - In Service is given as 49; however, the Jetstar website[1] shows them as having 43 in the mainline fleet, while FR24[2] lists 81 - which doesn't even match the sum of the three carriers listed on the Jetstar website. I'm inclined to set this to 43, as the Jetstar website is the only source with a figure. Additionally, the number of orders is given as 3... given the A320 CEO is out of production, this can only be transfers from Jetstar Asia, the demise of which is covered by an AFR article.[3] However, I can't access the full article, and the URL seems to suggest 13 rather than 3 planes... Anyone know any better?
  • A321 - Jetstar website lists the capacity as 220-230, not a flat 230
  • A321neo LR - Jetstar lists 19 in service and FR24 23 in service... neither matching the 20 in the table!

As for sources, any objection to tidying them up and removing extraneous sources once the above has been figured out? Danners430 (talk) 11:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Our fleet". Jetstar Airways.
  2. ^ "Jetstar Fleet". Flightradar24.
  3. ^ "Qantas to close Jetstar Asia and redirect planes back to Australia". Australian Financial Review. 2025-06-10. Retrieved 2025-06-11.

New image changes

Hey all, just added some important examples, i.e. the aircraft who featured the roos livery and also the A320neo. There are two versions of A320ceo and neo and essential to display. Please message here to discuss. We want to get the articles to featured images. ~2026-16416-11 (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article is already overflowing with images. We absolutely do not need images of every A320 variant. It’s already bordering on breaching WP:GALLERY. Danners430 tweaks made 21:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Danners430. No worries. But its best to try and full the fluff off your eyes and get the Jetstar article to WP:Featured Article. Nice you actually responded, the dickheads on the other topics don't even bother and bang it to WP:AN3. I won't proceed with any more edits at this time --~2026-16416-11 (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would advise you watch what you say - even if what you just said isn't directed at me, it's still in breach of WP:CIVIL. Danners430 tweaks made 21:29, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.