What's it going to take to prove that the standard java decompiler is "noteworthy"? It's certainly more noteworthy than 98% of the stuff on wikipedia. Go check
| This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
What's it going to take to prove that the standard java decompiler is "noteworthy"? It's certainly more noteworthy than 98% of the stuff on wikipedia. Go check any major java site (IBM developer works, Sun, online sites, whatever) and you'll see it referenced time and time again. 76.68.27.113 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Website is down. Is it dead? --206.72.77.76 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
A vida me pregou mais uma peça por essa não pude esperar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.48.112.24 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
It is JAD or Jad? Currently this article uses both. --Mortense (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The title of the article is capitalized incorrectly. Is there any way to change that? Inside the article it is written as Java. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbyqwerty12 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.