What's our source for this? -Willmcw 21:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
What's our source for this? -Willmcw 21:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
I think it's important to note the historic significance of the term "internal improvements," rather than just considering it to be synonymous with "public works." The version I just reverted to has links to public works and infrastructure, but also a reference to some of the individuals in history who campaigned for what were called "internal improvements," which will certainly be of interest to encyclopedia readers who are looking up that subject. And as a note to the anonymous editor who wanted to add material on Henry Clay, there is also a link to American System (economics), where material on Clay would be appropriate. --HK 15:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Reading this section for the first time, it seems a jumble of vaguely related thoughts, which suggest more questions than answers. Perhaps this is just where previous editors dumped misc text. Alas, I don't have the subject matter expertise to clean it up nor flesh it out. I'm sorry to criticize and run; I just wish the article was more informative and objective. Zulu Kane (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
this single largest project of the antebellum era, with nearly US$7 million in federal dollars spent between 1806 and 1841.
seems imprecise; it should be single largest federal project, as Erie canal was similar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.