Talk:Internal devaluation
This article seems to have large sections of POV, uncited original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.175.219 (talk) 01:31, 11 June 2012
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article seems to have large sections of POV, uncited original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.175.219 (talk) 01:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Jason from nyc (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Blatantly biased and unsourced article. At this point it would be better to trim it to the essential, informative parts. 90.163.81.154 (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This article is an embarrassment. It needs almost an entire rewrite. It fails to serve the purpose of informing the reader what an internal devaluation actually IS. I will return next week with a draft of what this should look like, and see if we can get a consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.106.24 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
This should be updated, period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.218.210.40 (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
This is one of the worst wikipedia articles I've ever read. Will anyone update it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.82.135.21 (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Confusing sentence
That is why the widely discussed eventual success of internal devaluation is considered as urban legend or in worst cases - as political propaganda by neoliberal or Keynesian economists
Does this mean that neoliberal or Keynesian economists consider it propaganda, or does this mean that it is considered as propaganda coming from neoliberal or Keynesian economists? --Gerrit CUTEDH 00:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.