Talk:Intelligent building

No it wouldn't be a good idea as civil engineers discuss the section as Intelligent buildings —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.72.70.113 (talk • con

No it wouldn't be a good idea as civil engineers discuss the section as Intelligent buildings —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.72.70.113 (talk • contribs)


More, please!

can someone provide some more stuff ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.228.177.189 (talk • contribs) .

Differences between Building Automation and Intelligent Buildings

Latest comment: 19 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I am from the Building Automation Industry. Building Automation Industry is mainly associated with HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air-conditioning.) Components of Intelligent building can also include fire, security, access controls etc. I say leave both in their place.

I think Home automation, room automation, and domotics should be merged into one article, but Intelligent building should remain a separate article for the reasons stated above. Takeitupalevel 03:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Intelligent Buildings are quite different from Building Automation, Home Automation, and the like. It is also different from Building Intelligence, which is knowledge about the buildings, as described by the Industry Foundation Classes or the currently very active (in the US) National Building Information Standards (NBIMS) derived from and allied with the IFCs. TobyConsidine 18:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

It may be the case that Intelligent Buildings are quite different from Building Automation, but the article does not state this. The article needs to explicitly state the difference between them. --Eptin 03:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.