Talk:Image conversion

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep and rewrite.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Computing: Software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Hey there, I saw a "speedy deletition" tag at the page that I have recently created. I think that this article may be treared as significant since it covers the image conversion process as a phenomenon. However, the article has been created for the purpose to demonstrate the fact that some software programs of that kind may be multifunctional . I don't think that it may be treated as advertising. Please assist me in my publishsing. If necessary, please show me the parts that should be changed or deleted. --Vein eater (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Primarily, the use of ReaSoftware as an "example" would be unnecessary in an article focused solely on the phenomenon of image conversion. I'm also pretty sure this fits well under other articles for graphics software and does not need its own article. Furthermore, if the article is about image conversion, then the primary focus should be on the how of image conversion, like the underlying programming discussion. If it's so simple as "save as", then it's probably not notable enough for an article. Items need references based on secondary sources. This whole article seems like a trojan horse for you to push your favorite software. ju66l3r (talk) 06:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have removed all references to ReaSoft and applied NPOV. I'm not enough of an expert on the subject to bring this article past start-class, but it has been saved from deletion. HatlessAtless (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I rewrote most of the article, but it's still a mess. What is this page about exactly? Do we really need it? --77.134.129.193 (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply