This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
is this name derived from the name of the spacecraft 'icarus' in the british space film Sunshine??
That name is taken from the Icarus of Greek mythology. Many space stories take the name Icarus from a cautionary tale and doom their spacecraft from the start....
Also, Icarus is the English version of the Greek Ikaros, so they’re basically the same thing.
Interstellar?
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
According to Space.com, Ikaros is the first solar said to "fly on an interstellar mission."
I would guess that they meant "interplanetary". There have yet to be any probes of any kind (solar sail or no) sent on interstellar missions-- the spacecraft currently on their way out of the solar system have all exceeded their mission lifetimes and will not arrive at another star system for many millenia, and will not be operational when the do. siafu (talk) 21:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
That is because the Voyagers are interstellar probes. They are on an interstellar trajectory that will take them, eventually, well beyond the Sun's influence. Whether a mission is interstellar depends on if its velocity/trajectory allows it to escape the Sun's gravitational field. Of course they'll be long out of power by then and unable to communicate so while the probes are interstellar the mission obviously isn't. Saying that they do carry those famous plaques which could be considered part of their "mission".
There is a conspicuous chart (partially in Japanese) in the IKAROS-blog on 12 December 2010[1]. According to the official blog on 10 December 2010[2], the minimun distance was announced to be 80800 km at 16:39(JST) 8 December in Japanese. --Gwano (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC) - added. --Gwano (talk) 03:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Acceleration
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"JAXA confirmed that IKAROS is being accelerated by its solar sail." How much? What is the delta-V that is due to the sail (as opposed to the Sun's gravity)? Mcswell (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Speed
Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
At what speed is IKAROS traveling?
And how much of this speed comes from the solar sail versus the original speed before it left the other spacecraft?
Is it always accelerating? And if so, by how much? And how fast is it expected to travel in the future?
The sail's thrust was 1.1 mN and velocity shift for 5 months got to 100 m/s [3]. Japanese PDF of the official site[4] contains some graphs. From right graph in page 9, it seems to be always accelerated (and reached 100 m/s on November). From center graph in page 10, IKAROS got a little gravity assist from the Venus. I couldn't find absolute velocity of IKAROS, but the speed will not differ from someting else orbiting Earth-Venus transfer heliocentric orbit very much.--Gwano (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC) - Fix mistake (underline) --Gwano (talk) 11:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
On Nov 22, the distance from Earth was reported as 206480857 km.
On Dec 3, the distance from Earth was reported as 216897056 km.
That's a distance of 10416199 km [7] in approximately 11 days, or an equivalent speed of 10.9598053 km per second [8].
Of course, IKAROS is not travelling directly away from Earth, so some trigonometry could be used to determine how much faster than this IKAROS is going, but at these distances and with so much error in the time component (exactly 11 days?) it's probably not worth it for this rough estimate.
For comparison, Voyager 1 is traveling at about 17 km/s. [9]
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is IKAROS already broken? I can't find any news about IKAROS after venus flyby at Dec, 2010.
I don't think this is normal for IKAROS because which should have more flyby to nearby planet soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.73.89.188 (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
http://www.jspec.jaxa.jp/ikaros_channel/e/ has some recent news about radio contact from July 4, if Google Translate is reliable. The news from June 20 appears to indicate the spacecraft has been in hibernation due to insufficient insolation and the team was recently making contact attempts, but we'd need a Japanese reader to really be sure of the details. -84user (talk) 23:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Orbit of IKAROS?
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can anybody supply information about the orbit of IKAROS? Obviously the solar sail has an effect on the orbit of the spacecraft, so it is more than gravitiy ("Newton") at work here. But are there estimatess for perihelion, aphelion and orbital period of IKAROS (2010-020E)? And if anybody could find the "initial" trajectory (without the effect of the solar sail), the delta-v it has collected (and so on) this would be great. Tony Mach (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
On the contrary, any high school kid who passes his general science class should easily be able to do that calculation - not just professionals. 50.111.1.232 (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
No, it's not "floating around" in space - it is on a trajectory. One doesn't bring a 10 km/sec craft to a dead stop without a whole helluva lotta work (in the physics sense.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.1.232 (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's just weird that we haven't heard much about it, which is why I'm echoing what the IP said. For something as ambitious as this, you would think there would be more media coverage. Viriditas (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Missing figure
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
the section titled "Purpose" includes several references to an illustration that is not included, starting with "(comments in parentheses refer to figure):" – either the figure needs to be added or those references should be removed ManlyMatt (talk) 07:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Article (8 December 2025) says IKAROS deployed on 14 July 2010, and then on 9 July 2010 it “was being accelerated by its solar sail.” Perhaps the first of these two dates should be “4” instead of “14”, or the second date should be “19” instead of “9”.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.