Talk:Humin
I propose a new section, Criticism... based on .mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\""…
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Criticism
I propose a new section, Criticism... based on Lehmann, J.; Kleber, M. (2015-12-03), "The contentious nature of soil organic matter", Nature, 528, doi:10.1038/nature16069. Please see discussion at Talk:Humus. -- Paleorthid (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Literature on humin
Approximately 2500 reports have appeared about humin, according to Chemical Abstracts. This flood of literature is the basis of the guideline WP:SECONDARY. Here are the well cited review:
- Hayes, M. H. B.; Clapp, C. E., Humic substances: considerations of compositions, aspects of structure, and environmental influences. Soil Sci. 2001, 166, 723-737. doi 10.1097/00010694-200111000-00002
- Rice, J. A., Humin. Soil Sci. 2001, 166, 848-857. doi 10.1097/00010694-200111000-00009
- Filiciotto, L.; Balu, A. M.; Van der Waal, J. C.; Luque, R., Catalytic insights into the production of biomass-derived side products methyl levulinate, furfural and humins. Catal. Today 2018, 302, 2-15. doi 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.008
- Lipczynska-Kochany, E., Humic substances, their microbial interactions and effects on biological transformations of organic pollutants in water and soil: A review. Chemosphere 2018, 202, 420-437. doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.104
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.