Redirect to:
of the question. Q1: Why does the Human article use the third person? Aren't we humans? A1: The third person ("Humans are..." or "They are..." as opposed...
Click to read more »'represents' or 'symbolizes' the whole human race will be a profound violation of Wikipedia policy. See Talk:Human/FAQdraft, Q1. -Silence (talk) 19:00, 30 September...
Click to read more »try); no species or subspecies article employs a collage. See Talk:Human/FAQdraft. -Silence (talk) 00:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Han-Chinese are the most...
Click to read more »'less human' than the Western-looking, androcentric couple we have preferred. As explained in Talk:Human/FAQdraft, this is not an article called 'Human nature'...
Click to read more »wrote in FAQdraft, but I did not see commentary on that FAQdraft by other editors that explicitly agreed with the final product. Since that FAQdraft languished...
Click to read more »information on human knowledge." It is implicit that our readership is human. (On the voice used in this article, please see Q5 in Talk:Human/FAQdraft, or, as...
Click to read more »