Talk:Hamad
This someone is not just someone. He is a big man, a royal family member or something. And he has his own wikipedia page I believe.175.103.25.137 (talk) 10:20, …
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Al Futaisi Island
This someone is not just someone. He is a big man, a royal family member or something. And he has his own wikipedia page I believe.175.103.25.137 (talk) 10:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- See also the mention in the Al Futaisi article and in search results here. I don't believe that this person currently reaches the inclusion threshold for mention in this WP:disambiguation page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yup. this pertains to this edit by the IP, adding the island owned by the person in question. I initially removed it but then restored it, moved it to a more appropriate place in the list, and rewrote it to clarify why it was being listed [1]. As I said in my edit summary, "No objection ftom me if anyone thinks this still does not belong" Someone having dug huge trench to spell their name is a weak reason to include. Meters (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to me that this meets WP:GNG. I delete articles from time to time, but I'm generally very soft on MW:Deletionism. That article isn't a complete WP:orphan, but it's close and is linked from other articles where the notability status is questionable. I wouldn't object if a deletionist came along and axed it, but perhaps it should be WP:PRODed; that would probably lead either to deletion or to a talk page discussion working towards consensus about whether to delete it, defer deletion, or open a WP:AFD discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same. The article about the island is just an excuse to mention the Sheikh's grandiose (and failed) exercise in self-publicity. Meters (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Well, even though the thing has failed, I guess it is still okay to stay.175.103.25.137 (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same. The article about the island is just an excuse to mention the Sheikh's grandiose (and failed) exercise in self-publicity. Meters (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to me that this meets WP:GNG. I delete articles from time to time, but I'm generally very soft on MW:Deletionism. That article isn't a complete WP:orphan, but it's close and is linked from other articles where the notability status is questionable. I wouldn't object if a deletionist came along and axed it, but perhaps it should be WP:PRODed; that would probably lead either to deletion or to a talk page discussion working towards consensus about whether to delete it, defer deletion, or open a WP:AFD discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yup. this pertains to this edit by the IP, adding the island owned by the person in question. I initially removed it but then restored it, moved it to a more appropriate place in the list, and rewrote it to clarify why it was being listed [1]. As I said in my edit summary, "No objection ftom me if anyone thinks this still does not belong" Someone having dug huge trench to spell their name is a weak reason to include. Meters (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.