Talk:God

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Talk:God
Former good articleGod was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 22, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 13, 2005Good article nomineeListed
January 28, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 15, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 15, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Pantheism and NPOV

I don't want to assert or suggest that the details about pantheism in the introduction are erroneous or exaggerated as I'm not an expert on the subject and I don't have time to do in-depth research on this, but I think language could be forged that is more in line with the Neutral Point of View policy.

The existing text is too matter-of-fact. Church theologists did this? Was this strictly a Christian phenomenon? Were they "attacking" pantheism or investigating it? Maybe arguing against pantheism? Was there a motivation for this attack or argument? And how did such (presumably) scholarly people as clergy get the definition of pantheism wrong? There's a lot here that raises more questions than answers which doesn't feel appropriate for the introduction. HistorianFromSyracuse (talk) 04:06, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pantheism "is primarily a polemical term", so there are not many pantheists in Ancient history. Source: Lagrée, Jacqueline (2005). "Pantheism". In Lacoste, Jean-Yves (ed.). Encyclopedia of Christian Theology. Vol. 3. Routledge. p. 1181. ISBN 978-1-57958-332-3. Retrieved 23 January 2026.
Thomson (2008: 54) fails verification. It concerns Spinozism, not Ancient theology. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

NPOV on Heading definition

Edit definition to "supreme holy One, intelligent sovereign creator of the complex system of Universe with its living mortals, original source of life, merciful omnipotent ruler of natural law, and primary venerated figure by vast number of believing mankind above the Earth."

There is a user made an objection against my contribution on POV matters, any comment would be considered. Andeubn (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Need a reason to change from what’s already there, so what was wrong with it? What is wrong about God is usually viewed as the supreme being, creator, and principal object of faith? Hyperbolick (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don't know about "object of faith", but I thought that most depictions of a monotheistic God portray him as a creator deity, and as the main character of their various creation myths. Dimadick (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Objective reality?

Objective reality is mentioned in the existence section, but it doesn’t link to another article. ~2026-17842-44 (talk) 09:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I found a trademark argument article that immediately addressed my curiosity. ~2026-17842-44 (talk) 09:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.