Talk:GoFundMe

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Finance & Investment Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. San Diego Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject San Diego To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner. Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles. Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article. Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs. Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess. Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality. Get San Diego into Featured article status. Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic. Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Archives (Index)

2021 2022 2023

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

I would like to propose adding a dedicated Controversies section to this article.

While GoFundMe has enabled many widely praised fundraising efforts, the article currently documents a growing number of disputes, criticisms, and enforcement-related issues that are scattered across sections such as “Notable projects”, “Charity fraud”, and issue-specific subsections. As the number and variety of these cases has increased over time, the current structure makes it difficult for readers to distinguish between positive, neutral, and disputed uses of the platform.

There is now a clear pattern of well-sourced controversies spanning multiple years, including but not limited to:

• Anti-vaccine fundraising (2019–2023): GoFundMe announced a ban on anti-vaccine fundraisers in 2019, yet subsequent reporting by outlets such as The Independent, The Daily Beast, and The Sunday Times found that numerous anti-vaccine and so-called “vaccine injury” campaigns continued to raise significant sums, prompting criticism of enforcement consistency.

• Handling of politically sensitive fundraisers:

 – The 2022 Canada “Freedom Convoy” fundraiser, which raised approximately $9 million before removal, sparked backlash over GoFundMe’s initial plan to redirect funds and led to political investigations and public criticism before the company reversed course and refunded donors.  
 – The 2023 fundraiser organised by Jean Messiha following the killing of 17-year-old Nahel Merzouk raised more than €1.6 million and became the subject of legal scrutiny and widespread public controversy in France.  
 – The 2026 fundraiser for U.S. ICE agent Jonathan E. Ross following the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good prompted criticism from multiple outlets questioning GoFundMe’s enforcement of its own legal defence fundraising policies.

• Legal defence fund inconsistencies (2014–2026): Multiple high-profile cases over more than a decade (including Darren Wilson, Sweet Cakes by Melissa, Luigi Mangione, and Jonathan Ross) have generated repeated media discussion about selective or inconsistent enforcement of GoFundMe’s stated rules regarding legal defence fundraising.

• Fraud and moderation failures: High-profile scams such as the “Paying It Forward” case and the MMS Defense Fund have been widely reported and are often cited as examples of shortcomings in platform oversight and moderation.

• Humanitarian and geopolitical disputes: In 2024–2025, GoFundMe faced criticism reported by international media outlets, including Al Jazeera, regarding the removal or freezing of Gaza-related humanitarian aid campaigns. These reports framed the issue as a dispute over compliance, sanctions, and moderation practices, and sparked broader debate about the role of crowdfunding platforms in humanitarian crises.

• Nonprofit page creation without consent (2025): Reporting by ABC/KGO-TV found that GoFundMe had automatically created donation pages for approximately 1.4 million nonprofits without prior consultation, leading to objections from some organisations.

At present, many of these issues are mixed into lists of notable campaigns or isolated subsections, which obscures their significance as recurring criticisms of the platform rather than one-off incidents. Comparable large technology and financial platforms on Wikipedia (e.g. PayPal, Patreon, Kickstarter) summarise similar patterns in a dedicated Controversies section to improve neutrality, structure, and reader comprehension.

I am not proposing the removal of any existing content, nor an expansion beyond what is already supported by reliable secondary sources. Rather, I am suggesting a reorganisation that would consolidate clearly documented controversies into a single section, allowing both the positive impact and the documented criticisms of GoFundMe to be presented proportionately and clearly.

I welcome feedback on whether this restructuring would improve the article’s clarity and alignment with Wikipedia’s content and style guidelines.

We don't add controversy sections per WP:CSECTION. If there is information you presented above you feel deserves included elsewhere on the page, please provide the sourcing and reasoning for inclusion. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

here is the source (Personal attack removed). https://www.go fundme.com/f/support-ice-officer-jonathan-ross ~2026-54469-2 (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

As the message box at the beginning of the section says, this table lacks an inclusion criterion. It's a very partial list, and it's not clear what did or didn't make the cut, or why this information is important. Also, the rightmost column of the table blocks the wikipedia toolbar.

Alternatively, one can replace it with a "List of Largest Fundraisers", or find a similar organizing principle for the list, and then do the work to make sure the list meets this definition. OphirElKbir (talk) 09:51, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply