Talk:GlusterFS

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking / Software This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing This redirect is supported by Networking task force. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.

I don't know whether this affects the "notability" discussion or not, but GlusterFS is a open source software project, not a product or a service.

In this respect it is similar to Linux. GlusterFS is offered as a product by Gluster, Inc., and is strongly associated with Gluster, Inc., just as Linux is offered as a product by Redhat and Novell (via the SUSE_Linux_distributions). Like Linux, that doesn't make GluserFS inseparable from Gluster, Inc. See http://www.gluster.org for some information on the "Gluster Community".

Craigster0 (talk) 22:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

If I understand correctly, there is absolutely no relationship between GlusterFS and the "Oracle Lustre file system", despite the fact that they are similarly named. Can someone please confirm that this is true, and add some clarification to this article? Gigglesworth (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Added release version information with dates, but it has been reverted. I wonder why "version - date" is not useful (or against the rules). But pushing a revert button probably is easier, than to add more info, to get it better fit the rules. Just a random thoughts. You can revert it too. 213.221.17.130 (talk) 14:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Basically, listing only the versions and their release dates has little encyclopedic value; it would have been completely different if each version line also included its highlights, such as the new features it brought etc. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 21:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

so putting it here, i believe it will be useful, if not for you, but for other people (feel free to add more features and add it back to main page, pressing revert/undo button is not constructive). See as well What are the Red Hat Gluster Storage releases. 213.221.17.130 (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Release history:
* 3.2.0, 5 May 2011
* 3.3.0, 30 May 2012, release of RHS 2.0 (2012-06-26)
* 3.4.0, 12 Jul 2013, release of RHSS 2.1 (2013-09-16)
* 3.5.0, 1 May 2014
* 3.6.0, 31 Oct 2014, release of RHSS 3.0 (2014-09-22)
* 3.7.0, 14 May 2015, https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.7/doc/release-notes/3.7.0.md

Please see X.Org Server § Releases section – that's an example of what we'd need. Beside the highlights, we'd also need a complete version history instead of only last few versions. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 23:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GlusterFS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402165836/http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/es.aspx?s=1795&e=556851 to http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/es.aspx?s=1795&e=556851

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply