Talk:Genetic algorithm scheduling
This page should not be deleted. I had not yet added the figures that I referred to in the article.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page should not be deleted. I had not yet added the figures that I referred to in the article.
Is this page important?
I understand why genetic algorithms should have a page and why scheduling problems should have a page. But their intersection does not seem to deserve its own page. Can this be merged or deleted? AustinBuchanan (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
[I am not AustinBuchanan. I do not even know who s/he is.] I agree with AustinBuchanan. This wiki page references so few papers that it appears to be a page touting those papers, rather than discussing a greater body of knowledge. Also, the statement, "Genetic algorithms are well suited to solving production scheduling problems, because unlike heuristic methods genetic algorithms operate on a population of solutions rather than a single solution" is an opinion for which the writer provides no support. In contrast, while dated, Aarts and Lenstra's seminal book on heuristic methods for combinatorial optimization argues that genetic algorithms are not a natural fit for resource-scheduling problems because of the difficulty of defining an effective crossover method. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.124.49 (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.