I'm getting annoyed the changes and reverted. If you want to revert, discuss here first. After all, this article was first placed as a Redirect and left for age
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Generation Love article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Creating this article doesn't give you any sort of rights to it at all. Stop acting like every change requires your approval, because it doesn't. all of my edits to this page have been valuable to the article. CloversMallRat (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Things to improve
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Content--I don't know how to describe the song--what version of country is it? Which instruments? (see for eg. the Not That Far Away article).
Music Review--Any proper music review from an established source?
I created that page fyi, and a lot of the work done on that page to make it a good article was done by myself. And anyways, a reference for the airplay date can be added from MusicRow or AllAccess, to name two options, but once the dates are in the past, then the reference is no longer needed because those websites stay current and don't keep old dates. There's probably no website with "Generation Love" listed now that its been out a month. CloversMallRat (talk) 15:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion
The chart dated May 14, 2011 is when Generation Love debuted, based on the way Billboard dates their charts in the future. If you look at the list of #1 country hits, for example: List of number-one country singles of 2011 (U.S.), you find no chart dated May 2, 2011; it simply doesn't exist. I'd appreciate it if you would please clue yourself in, User:Foxhound66, instead of continuing to edit war on this page and continuing to personally attack me by suggesting things like 'I can't read'. CloversMallRat (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
You provided no source whatsoever, I provided a source, and you are the one reverting without discussing. Charts begin at the beginining of the week and May the 14 was not the begining of the week. Please education your self with the days of the week.
I know a lot more about country music than you ever will. I have contributed a lot of valuable information and created a large sum of country music-based articles on Wikipedia in the past 4+ years. Anyways, you're continuing to make no effort to understand any of this; you are misinterpretting the way Billboard dates its charts. Read this and look for the #1 country song for the week of May 2, 2011: List of number-one country singles of 2011 (U.S.)... you won't find one, 'cause there is no chart with that date. CloversMallRat (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
May 2 is the date of the Billboard Country Update issue, but not the date of the chart contained within. This link direct from Billboard makes it clear that "Generation Love" debuted the chart week of May 14, 2011. Eric444 (talk) 01:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Confusing. Why was it posted earlier?If you check the other artists that is thier ranking for May 02. Week Starts May 02. May 14 is in middle of the week. I countributed to coutnry music too. Don't play with me. Other dictionaries are better (talk) 11:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, look, I'm gonna try to explain this to you. Billboard may have posted that on May 2, 2011, but they date their charts like 10+ days in the future, so that week is actually called the chart week of May 14, 2011. That's how it works. TBH, it doesn't make the most sense, but thats how they do it. Just accept that it works that way and move on. CloversMallRat (talk) 17:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just read the Wikipedia article on Billboard. It says everything you need to know: Billboard Hot 100. Either figure out how the Billboard chart works so you can make logical edits (instead of vandalizing my good edits), or stop editing song articles. CloversMallRat (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
How about just the fact that all the current charts on the Billboard website are dated June 4? Check back on Thursday when they update and it'll be changed to June 11. Eric444 (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
External links modified
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Generation Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.