Talk:GNOME Project
AFAIK the GNOME Foundation is something like KDE e.V., while The GNOME Project is something like the KDE community of people who contribute to the software. Use
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
The GNOME Project vs GNOME Foundation
AFAIK the GNOME Foundation is something like KDE e.V., while The GNOME Project is something like the KDE community of people who contribute to the software. User:ScotXWt@lk 12:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
g.n.o.m.e
I have to be that guy - wta the letters mean? G N O M E. please explain? example: with GNU, while explanation is not satisfying, at least the article for GNU mentions that it is a recursive acronym. which accounts for the N & the U.
where did the capitlaized name GNOME come from? thx skakEL 17:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Criticism of GNOME
The GNOME project has been controversial at times, as evident through clashes with the greater Linux community over the years. As an example, see the recent GTK4/libadwaita fiasco, and disagreements with the Budgie project over this.
I think this page should outline at least some of these criticisms. At present, the only material I can find documenting this is GNOME#Criticism, but it only concerns the criticism of GNOME 3.
172.218.5.205 (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Some mistakes
Sorry I meant original analysis not original research in my edit notes CataPunero (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.