Talk:Functional fixedness

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cognitive science (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The creation of this page is a group project of Dr. Kent Norman's Spring semester 2006 course, Thinking and Problem Solving, at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Good start. A few things need to be cleaned up. 1. Einstellung is "habituation" and may not be directly functional fixedness. 2. Are the images free to use? What about techniques to avoid functional fixedness?

Change the section "Experiments" to "Examples in research" or something like that. Also, I would add a sentence or two to the definition at the beginning to clarify things. Changes, "Sources" to "References".

The opening definition should be a little longer to get the point across, otherwise the article is well written. The placement of the picture is a problem causing the contents to be a long box at the left. I am concerned about whether the images are in the Public Domain or not. I think that would have to draw them yourselves rather than use scanned images from a book. Group total = 47/50.

Surely the best use for an object is the very use for which it was designed? 86.40.16.16 (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but the point is that the object may have additional uses other than the one for which it was designed - and 'functional fixedness' is the tendency to be so blinded by the main or intended purpose, that these additional uses are overlooked. A ruler is for measuring distances - but it makes a handy edge for drawing straight lines. A pocket calculator is for doing arithmetic, but you can enter someone's phone number and store it into the calculator's memory if you're worried about forgetting it. These additional uses require us to exercise a degree of mental flexibility that demands that we bypass our tendencies towards functional fixedness. SteveBaker (talk) 04:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply