@FeldBum - Responding here per your guidance on Mark Hyman (doctor)’s Talk Page. I’m unfamiliar and wasn’t involved with the previous draft that was submi…
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
@FeldBum - Responding here per your guidance on Mark Hyman (doctor)’s Talk Page. I’m unfamiliar and wasn’t involved with the previous draft that was submitted. Thanks for sharing this, providing some suggestions to this draft (see further down). You’ve covered a fair amount here, do you need additional citations for anything? Not sure if I need to add this here again, but I have a COI Hanschepps (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
They developed the platform with the goal of offering personalized healthcare using comprehensive lab testing and AI. [Source]
Hanschepps (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Can a third editor help with the Blood draw requirement and Criticism sections here? I built the page based off of an edit request on Mark Hyman's page (here). I've been going back and forth with Truthsetusfree about the Criticism and Blood draw volume requirement sections on the page. I don't have an issue with either section, but I think edits there are unwarranted, fairly POV and poorly sourced.
The blood draw section additions are all drawn from a single Reddit post, but the language is plural ("users" and "women"). Not sure how Reddit should be treated vis-a-vis the WP:SOCIALMEDIA policy, but there is definitely a range of reactions from people who have had the test, like this GMA article where the reporter had 10 vials drawn on visit one and less on visit 2, this NY Post one where the reporter gave 12 and then 8, and this airmail article where the reporter gave 20 total. I think it makes most sense to have something like "According to Function Health's FAQ, the service requires "about 35-85 mL depending on the person," which usually comes out to five to 10 vials, collected across two separate visits to Quest Diagnostics locations. Reporters and social media users have reported a larger range, which some reporting as much as 20 vials."
The criticism section feels a little coatrack to me, as well as a bit POV. For example, the line (uncited) that Hyman runs a "lucrative supplement empire" seems very POV, and--in the vein--most of the criticism is about Hyman's other business. The line "This dual role: diagnosing problems through Function Health while profiting from selling the remedies, has drawn scrutiny" feels like very much like an unsupported attribution. The next line, "Trustpilot has flagged the cross-promotion of supplements as a red flag undermining the trustworthiness of Function Health's guidance" seems dishonest, especially as the source is the main company page on Trustpilot, which does not mention that concern or flagging. Perhaps a specific reviewer has, but this claim is not in the Review Summary or easily found on that page. This line is unsourced and is clearly original research: "The concern is straightforward: when the person interpreting your blood tests also stands to gain from selling you supplements, the incentive to find 'problems' increases." The last two lines are just quotes from an article by Jonathan Jarry at McGill University's Office for Science and Society, which claim that Function Health is cross-promoting supplements (a line was added to the lede too), but in the actual Jarry article, the cross-promotion was occurring at Hyman's Ultra-Wellness Center, not at Function Health. There is legitimate criticism about Function Health on that page, but it relates to their claims, particularly about heavy metal poisoning claims, but I don't think the current section, nor the line in the lede, should stay as is. A section like "Some doctors and academics have said that Function Health's tests are unnecessary and expensive, and may introduce patient anxiety. Jonathan Jarry, a researcher at McGill's University Office for Science and Study, has also criticized some of the claims made by Function Health, such as 25% of the population having heavy metal poisining." with wikilinks, the above source and cites like NY Times and Time, makes more sense to me.
Truthsetusfreee and two other editors--2025-35542-22, Euthyphro94--have primarily or exclusively made edits to this page, with accounts being created in the last few months. I don't want to get into an edit war with them, so would love some assistance from other editors. I'll bump this up to dispute resolution or RfC.
--FeldBum (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Help determining which edits, particularly those sourced to social media, should go on this page. See previous section. FeldBum (talk) 03:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
"Function Health" "Hyman" in the main search box at the top of the page. Skip sources like PR Newswire (which is all press releases), but you should be able to find a couple dozen potentially useful sources. See if you can find anything from a good source that covers the same material. Then, when you've got a specific question, think about whether it's a common enough question that we have a noticeboard for it (e.g., go to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, ask "Can we use this Reddit post to say that people have had 20 tubes of blood drawn?", and wait for them to say "No") or if it's more of a custom situation, and you need an RFC (e.g., "Would comparing this company to Theranos, using this source, be non-neutral given the differences between the two models and the fact that this one does not appear to be a criminal fraud?" – or whatever question is left.) If it would be helpful to have background information, then you could ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. For example, if someone thinks that 20 tubes of blood is a lot, then it might be useful for them to know that even if all 20 tubes are the largest size, it's still much less blood than an ordinary blood donation. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Requesting edits - noting ([WP:COI|COI]]), posting under guidance of my colleague who shared requests here a while ago. Let me know if you need anything, happy to provide. Thank you. SarahSAutumn (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Minor Edits
Recent News - Drafted some page copy below, if helpful
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/health/diet-nutrition/a69927471/sweetgreens-doctor-designed-menu/ https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/food/sweetgreen-taps-longevity-expert-latest-collab
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/mergers-acquisitions/mh-function-health-getlabs-acquisition/ https://pulse2.com/function-health-acquires-getlabs-to-expand-at-home-testing-access/ SarahSAutumn (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Function Health. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 611 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Requesting some more edits re: recent company news noting COI. Thank you. SarahSAutumn (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/19/function-health-closes-298m-series-b-at-a-2-5b-valuation-launches-medical-intelligence/ https://insider.fitt.co/function-raises-298m-hits-2-5b-valuation/
https://time.com/7344997/chatgpt-health-medical-records-privacy-open-ai/ https://www.vogue.com/article/what-chatgpt-health-means-for-the-wellness-industry
https://fortune.com/2026/01/11/anthropic-unveils-claude-for-healthcare-and-expands-life-science-features-partners-with-healthex-to-let-users-connect-medical-records/ https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-chases-openai-ai-heath-claude-2026-1
https://longevity.technology/news/perplexity-enters-the-consumer-health-ai-arena/ https://www.business-standard.com/amp/technology/tech-news/perplexity-launches-health-feature-with-apple-health-fitbit-integration-126032000326_1.html https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/microsofts-new-ai-health-tool-can-read-your-medical-records-and-give-advice-d731f883
https://people.com/katy-perry-justin-trudeau-share-playful-moment-on-instagram-11936579
Current line: In May 2025, Function Health acquired Ezra and planned to add Ezra's MRI scanning technology to its platform. https://insider.fitt.co/function-health-acquires-full-body-mri-provider-ezra/
@WhatamIdoing @FeldBum @Mikalra Tagging as you've made previous edits on this page. SarahSAutumn (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.