Talk:Fully automatic time

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Time Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Athletics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Barely a Start class. Badly needs references.

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 15:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should this article not be Fully Automatic Timing (not Time)? It's a timing system, not a system of time. Yahoo and google result in far more results for 'timing' than 'time'. TheHYPO (talk) 12:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I expected a history section to this article. I would wright one but don't feel qualified. What is the history of work on such devices, when did they first enter the market, when did they first enter sport, when did they become mandatory in sport... etc.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:BE42:7400:51C4:D17D:3203:19C (talk) 17:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fully automatic time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1952/OR1952.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616175249/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1952/ATH/mens-100-metres.html to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1952/ATH/mens-100-metres.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616171507/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1956/ATH/mens-100-metres.html to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1956/ATH/mens-100-metres.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616204351/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1960/ATH/mens-100-metres.html to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/summer/1960/ATH/mens-100-metres.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fully automatic time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120824220406/http://www.wthejournal.com/en/en-direct/article/omega-olympics-games-2012-in-london-ready-set-go to http://www.wthejournal.com/en/en-direct/article/omega-olympics-games-2012-in-london-ready-set-go

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply