Talk:Foundation model

It seems to me this article should at least mention that the more established term of art is simply "large language model" and the term "foundation model" was p

Talk:Foundation model

Discussion of "large language model"

It seems to me this article should at least mention that the more established term of art is simply "large language model" and the term "foundation model" was proposed as an alternative. Thoughts? Kylebgorman (talk) Kylebgorman (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good question - large language models are a type of foundation models. Foundation models don't have to be about language. Ananyak94 (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think it's still good to mention the term "large language model", since it is one of the most prominent classes of "foundation models", and perhaps explicitly state the difference. Ananyak94 (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The earliest examples of foundation models were not large language models, but vision backbones.

Examples of such vision backbones are: VGG, AlexNet, and ResNet. Even though they pre-existed the coining of the term "foundation model" they were still foundation models in the strictest possible sense. Keskival (talk) 11:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Biased and false Frontier Model Section

"Frontier model" is a generic term to refer to the biggest and best LLMs in existence. They have larger training datasets more in depth training.

The term has nothing to do with "danger"

Does wikipedia define a sharp knife as "one that poses significant risk to the world"?

Military article about frontier models ~2026-44407-3 (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.