This article is poorly written, has misleading information (i.e. the statement that the Dadaists thought a urinal was beautiful is a complete misunderstanding o
| This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 13. The result of the discussion was move to Found object. |
This article is poorly written, has misleading information (i.e. the statement that the Dadaists thought a urinal was beautiful is a complete misunderstanding of Duchamp), and, perhaps most important, it is redundant with the Found art article to which Found object (singular) is redirected. emw 14:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Examples:
Examples:
Examples:
Tyrenius 10:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I've rewritten the article and hopefully these points have now all been addressed. Grutness...wha? 01:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Because of the rewrite and the other issues that have been brought up, it seemed like this should no longer be deleted. However I don't think the plural form Found objects is the right place, the singular Found object seems to be better. Right now, Found object is a redirect to Found art. I'd like to propose: - to Move the Found objects page to Found object - to redirect the Found objects page to Found object I'd add this comment to the talk page of Found objects as well. - Clubmarx | Talk 19:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.