Talk:Focus

I removed this in the hopes someone would be encouraged to rewrite it:

Talk:Focus

Untitled

I removed this in the hopes someone would be encouraged to rewrite it:

A kind of attractor with complex exponent that suggests oscillatory behavior of the dissipative system before reaching equilibrium. Pizza Puzzle

Should there perhaps be a page on focus in terms of sticking with a task and not getting distracted? Perhaps a link to "attention" or "persistence" or something like that would suffice. Iain Marcuson

Checkout the link to the wikitionary. WP:Disambig pages are about helping people find enyclopedia articles, not dictionary definitions. Megapixie 15:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

focus

the word focus can mean the inner part of a earthquake so i think that should be added to the page! i'm now going to use another website to look for it.

Focus

Can anybody please create an article about focus? I've tried to find it, but found only this useless page.--Dojarca 11:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

foci theory, Debray, 60s Guevarism

The South-American (and also European) urban guerilla groups of the 60s believed in the (Guevarist, but propagated by Regis Debray focus, foci theory of revolution: Fires rapidely and unstoppably igniting. The Weather Underground's 70s manifesto was not called called: Prairie Fire for nothing.--Radh (talk) 12:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace

I added “Anti-Nazi Council”, a 1930s organisation operated by a group known as Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace sometimes called the Focus Group, including Winston Churchill. It is also properly listed at Focus Group (disambiguation) but that would not help people here who are unaware of that nickname, i.e. the full title “Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace” does not include the word “Group”. Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.