I beleive a criticism should be added. Recently, I read Hudson, Ohio school district had to close-down for a day due to First Student being unorganized. I've he
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I beleive a criticism should be added. Recently, I read Hudson, Ohio school district had to close-down for a day due to First Student being unorganized. I've heard of this happening in other districts aswell; one of these should be sourced and made into a criticism section.JakeH07 (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This article is one of three aticles about the operations of First Student, a subsidiary of First Group in one of three geographies. Each article lacks context and should be merged into a single article with three sections.
Currently, it is taking over the article and is not allowing for the rest of content to be added onto. While I'm not in support of eliminating it (similar subsections exists in other articles about companies); I don't think it should be added onto every time a news story involving the company is released. There are other places on the Internet for that. As it sits, this article needs some attention. --SteveCof00 (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The controversy section was deleted from the article, as it brought many neutrality questions into the entire article itself. Sure, many of those issues may have been controversial and may need to be heard, but Wikipedia is NOT the place for that to happen. There wasn't any blatant original research, but "overtly slanted" towards one view is not how articles are (supposed to be) written. With all the news stories gone, it can be easier to give attention to the remaining content that describes the company itself. This is what the casual reader (who may not be familiar with the school bus industry) is likely most interested in learning about. Etc etc. --SteveCof00 (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
This proposal has been up for nearly 2 years (it's been unsigned), but I think it's a good idea if done correctly. If anything, it will simplify the disambiguation page. I would suggest merging this page and its Canadian counterpart into a combined article; the more-complete UK article should remain freestanding. The US and Canada articles have a format that compliments each other better. --SteveCof00 (talk) 08:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi! I work for a communications firm that represents Zonar and have a tiny COI edit request: Could we please wikilink the mention of Zonar in this article? Currently the Zonar Systems article is an orphan. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:14, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Edit request implemented Spintendo 22:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.