The "Audience and Reception" section, to me, seems particularly informal. Language such as "more as a," "only," and "more demanding" seems to me like it display
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The "Audience and Reception" section, to me, seems particularly informal. Language such as "more as a," "only," and "more demanding" seems to me like it displays an opinion rather than objectivity. Additionally, the way sources are used here feels more like an essay assignment, paraphrasing two sources with small snippets of verbatim quotations (if any) and using language such as "appealing," "even more positive," and "a neat package," diction that likely wasn't used in the original articles. Please review. Zhallium53 (talk) 04:12, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.