Talk:Feedzai

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review prior discussions if you are considering renomination. No consensus, 8 September 2022, see discussion. No consensus, 24 May 2022, see discussion. draftify, 10 March 2021, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 9 May 2022 by reviewer Tol (talk · contribs). Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Portugal Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Ssfdz (talk · contribs) has been paid by Feedzai. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Feedzai#Requesting_advice_on_how_to_avoid_deletion

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello,

I recently made several changes to this page on behalf of my employer, Feedzai. I have recently disclosed this conflict of interest in my profile page. It is my intention to provide fair, neutral tone and point of view to the Feedzai page. I welcome any feedback that will improve the quality of my page while meeting Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. Please advise on how I can improve the page - and more importantly, reduce the risk of page deletion.

Thank you for your time! Ssfdz (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Not done: This is the wrong way to contest an deletion. Participate in the discussion instead. ~ Aseleste_{charge-parity}^time 15:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, for the sake of full transparency, I am submitting this draft for review on behalf of my employer, Feedzai, as I have previously disclosed on my User Page.

I am including below a list of references that I’ve identified and believe meet the requirements for establishing notability according to WP:NCORP, which was the concern in March during the discussion.

New coverage that has been published since the last discussion :

• TechCrunch article
• Público article: Público is a very reputable source and is a major source of media in Portugal
• O Jornal Económico: Another major source of media in Portugal
• Another Público article: Note that this one is not about the funding round
• Observador article

Older coverage that I believe was missed during the previous discussion:

• Venture Beat article from 2014: This is a very reputable source and talks about the company in detail
• Forbes (Portugal) article from 2019: This is not a “sites” article and talks about the company in detail
• Wall Street Journal article from 2015: Wall Street Journal is a very reputable source

Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Ssfdz (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply