Talk:Fall to Grace
The album has been out for three days, we need to get the reviews. Here some:
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Sources
- Album artwork released - JuneGloom Talk 15:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Interview - JuneGloom Talk 16:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Review & album of the week - JuneGloom Talk 20:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Virgin Media review & source for pop genre - JuneGloom Talk 13:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
critical reception
The album has been out for three days, we need to get the reviews. Here some:
--91.154.99.187 (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 24 October 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 17:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Fall to Grace (album) → Fall to Grace – The film isn't notable in the slightest compared to the album - and we don't need a disambiguation page if there are only two topics and one is primary. Unreal7 (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose firstly dab page was incomplete - since en.wp was mislinking links about the 2005 film to the 2013 film. Secondly oppose as no Google Book evidence presented, thirdly 5 items featured on en.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Certainly by usage (September views):
- Fall to Grace (album): 1,756 views
- Fall to Grace (film): 215 views
- others: zero
- So, 89% of views for the album. And nothing else has more long-term significance. Even with the expanded dab page, the album is a clear primary topic. Dohn joe (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Well it isn't "zero" just because you haven't counted stats.grok.se for mentions of other topics on Jay Bakker Jim McGreevey René Alvarado Truly Indie List of Trapper John, M.D. episodes. Obviously pop albums get more because pop is popular. But this is still an encyclopedia that has to serve more than pop music. More to the point stats.grok only reflects what we provide, and we disproportionately provide post 2000 pop articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- IIO, I genuinely don't get why such blatant facts keep going right over your head. The album is the primary topic all day long. None of the other "Fall to Grace"'s have a patch of notability in comparison. You keep opposing songs/albums being the primary topic solely because they are songs/albums - please stop doing that. Unreal7 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Well it isn't "zero" just because you haven't counted stats.grok.se for mentions of other topics on Jay Bakker Jim McGreevey René Alvarado Truly Indie List of Trapper John, M.D. episodes. Obviously pop albums get more because pop is popular. But this is still an encyclopedia that has to serve more than pop music. More to the point stats.grok only reflects what we provide, and we disproportionately provide post 2000 pop articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Dohn joe. Facts are stubborn things, IIO. Calidum 00:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.