Talk:External auditor

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business: Accounting Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

does any one know of any aspects against external auditors???

What do you mean by aspects? As in negative aspects? Criticisms? Perceptions? - Mtmelendez ^{(TALK|UB|HOME)} 12:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Within the scope of business and economics it would seem that auditing should be afforded at least mid level importance. All public companies are required to have external auditors and most organizations have some form of internal audit department as well. Auditing is massive industry, and its impact on financial markets is far-reaching. With that said, I'm going to change the assessment to mid. Wambear1 (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have substantially edited this article, however the section on detection of fraud needs more content and a new section with recent events WikiCpa (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on External auditor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123144058/http://www.theiia.org/theiia/about-the-profession/internal-audit-faqs/?i=1086 to http://www.theiia.org/theiia/about-the-profession/internal-audit-faqs/?i=1086
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101107160153/http://www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/resources/audit/occ-hb-internal_external_audits-intro.pdf to http://www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/resources/audit/occ-hb-internal_external_audits-intro.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101107160153/http://www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/resources/audit/occ-hb-internal_external_audits-intro.pdf to http://www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/resources/audit/occ-hb-internal_external_audits-intro.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply