Talk:Existential generalization

Universal instantiation and Existential Generalization are two aspects of a single principle, for instead of saying that '(x(x=x)' implies 'Socrates is Socrates

Talk:Existential generalization

Quine

I am reading Quine at the moment (quintessence, extensionalism, Reference and Modality. From this I would like to add to this article:

Universal instantiation and Existential Generalization are two aspects of a single principle, for instead of saying that '(x(x=x)' implies 'Socrates is Socrates', we could as well say that the denial 'Socrates≠Socrates' implies '(∃x(x≠x)'. The principle embodied in these two operations is the link between quantifications and the singular statements that are related to them as instances. Yet it is a principle only by courtesy. It holds only in the case where a term names and, furthermore, occurs referentially[1].

Any ideas, remarks, or changes?
--Fan Singh Long (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ok, since no one has seen fit to leave any comments at all, I will edit the article now.
--Fan Singh Long (talk) 06:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Quine,W.V.O., Quintessence, Extensionalism, Reference and Modality, P366

Fitch notation

An example for only some free occurrences of x replaced by a would be

x R a → ∃x x R x

for some relation R. Assuming that the free occurrence of x is tacitly universally quantified, this looks ok. However, another example would be

x R x → ∃x x R x .

(no occurrences at all instantiated) this is wrong on an empty domain. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.