Talk:Erasmus MC

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

Talk:Erasmus MC

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erasmus MC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

spelling centre

They prefer the spelling "Centre":

View the website  https://www.erasmusmc.nl/en/pages/o/over-erasmusmc , click  "History of Erasmus MC", read the 1998 paragraph:

"1998: The dean of the Faculty of Medicine and the Executive Boards of Erasmus University Rotterdam and Rotterdam University Hospital meet on 7 October to discuss the formation of the Erasmus University Medical Centre."

If an institution prefers a specific spelling of its name, should we follow the preference? --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 05:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced MERS section

@74.93.205.118:, can you add some sources to your claims in the "MERS controversy" section? It contains numerous factual statements that each need to be supported by a reliable source. Kind regards, RWalen (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.