Talk:Equation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Equation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This  level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics High‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics High This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

This article contains a translation of Équation from fr.wikipedia.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090816161008/http://math.exeter.edu/rparris/winplot.html to http://math.exeter.edu/rparris/winplot.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I recently grouped the essentially-identical classes of differential equation, integral equation and integro-differential equation together. The change was reverted as "not an improvement". I think that showing the connection between these nominally different types of equations is indeed an improvement, even if my particular wording was not perfect. I have made my changes again. If anyone wants to revert them, please explain here why that is done. LachlanA (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

At: Equation#Types of equations, should the list begin with something like: "constant equation for degree zero", since equations like "y+2=5" are typically the first type of equations that students solve? (And to be more in sync with this article: Degree of a polynomial#Names of polynomials by_degree) DKEdwards (talk) 06:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

IMO, the answer is no, since "equation of degree zero" and "constant equation" are rarely used, while "polynomial of degree zero" is common. D.Lazard (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

What are they called then? Just "linear"? It seems they determine a point in a one dimensional space rather than a "line", unless we implicitly assume a 2nd dimension. Should there at least be a comment explaining the convention? "linear equation for degree one and zero"? DKEdwards (talk) 08:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

An equation that determines a point on a line has the form ${\displaystyle x=c,}$ and is therefore linear. Typical equations of degree zero would be ${\displaystyle 3=0}$ and ${\displaystyle 0=0.}$ They are so trivial that it is not interesting to name them. In other words, for being interesting, an equation must contain unknowns or variables, and this excludes the degree zero. D.Lazard (talk) 08:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why does this article use the terms "left-hand side" and "right-hand side"? The article is about mathematics, not anatomy.

In common English, one would not say, "left-hand eye" or "left-hand foot" or "left-hand elbow".

Neither reference 2 or 3 use the word "hand". Why does the article disagree with its references? Comfr (talk) 00:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

See e.g. Sides of an equation for the use of "hand". I have often seen this terminology (and the corrersponding abbreviations "LHS" and "rhs") when I worked as a mathematician. That's why I reverted your edit. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

In isolation, the English words left and right are ambiguous. For example, does "right door" mean the door on the right side or the correct door? For that reason, the word "hand" can be added to avoid confusion.

When the meaning of left or right are obvious from context, inserting "hand" takes space, without clarifying meaning. For example, "No left turn" on a highway sign clearly refers to direction.

In this article, "right side" carries as much information as "right-hand side". I removed the redundant word to improve the article.

Thanks for your link to Sides of an equation. The reference does use "right-hand side", however there is only one reference.

Thanks also for your many other contributions to Wikipedia. Comfr (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply