Talk:Emma Sinclair

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Hi there, I have updated this page so that it conforms to Wikipedia's standard of formatting, sources and references. However, it is constantly being reverted to the previous version that is incorrectly formatted, sourced and referenced. I do not wish to be involved in an edit war. Please can you help me.Keeley Dann (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I reverted because you removed referenced content, as I said in the edit summary. Specifically, there were two WP:RS references for Sinclair being forced out of her public company, Mission Capital, in 2008.^[1][2] You removed the refs and mention of her removal. Also, instagram and articles by Sinclair are low quality sources and should be replaced by independent coverage.Dialectric (talk) 02:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If there is no policy-based objection to including these references, I will add them when protection is lifted, to support a sentence stating that Sinclair was forced out of her public company, Mission Capital, in 2008.Dialectric (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted BonaFide88's readdition of the disputed material primarily because their edits at EnterpriseAlumni were blatant violations of the biographies of living persons policy. It may be reasonable to re-add the material with reliable sources, but at least one discussion participant's interpretation of "reliability" was so far off track that I have reverted all of their contributions about living people. Policy-based objections may be about undue weight, a lack of neutrality, for example. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are you making an objection to inclusion, or just positing what possible objections might be? One sentence on Sinclair's being forced out of the company is reasonable weight. The removed sentence as written was reasonably neutral, but could be pared down to just 'In 2008, Sinclair was forced out of her public company and lost her subsequent High Court case calling for reinstatement.' If there are no objections, I will add it in the next few days. If there are objections, I can open a WP:RFC to discuss this inclusion.Dialectric (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I probably shouldn't have reverted the change here on this page, as I personally was only concerned about the misuse of self-published and primary sources in the EnterpriseAlumni article. I have incorrectly assumed that the reference quality was similarly low here. Financial Times is something different than a self-published attack website.

Regarding holding an RfC, or perhaps a notice at WP:BLPN/WP:COIN: The more opinions by experienced users we can get, the better. Keeley Dann's sadly limited discussion participation hides the fact that one user strongly, and probably with a COI, opposes including the material. They're unable to provide policy-based objections as they lack policy knowledge. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Would like this to be considered for re-entry, I believe there is no dispute over this paragraph. If there is, please let me know. Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeley Dann (talk • contribs) 18:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The paragraph should not be added unless better sourcing is available. alumni.rothschildandco.com is a non-independent commercial source and lower quality than independent WP:RS refs typically needed for a WP:BLP.Dialectric (talk) 09:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Dialectric. I have reinstalled this paragraph with an independent source for Rothschild & Co. I do not believe this paragraph was otherwise in contention. Please let me know if this is okay. Thanks! Keeley Dann (talk) 20:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Emma+sinclair.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi everyone, stumbled across this page by chance, and after a little Googling, I've found that Keeley Dann is the name of one of Emma Sinclair's assistants. It stands to reason that Ms. Sinclair has probably asked Keeley Dann to "clean up" her Wikipedia on her behalf. Especially when we look at the removal of Ms. Sinclair's ousting from her company.

Just food for thought. JFezRidesAgain (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply