Talk:Emma Lyon
The result of the move request was: Moved. While there was some doubt expressed as to the primary topic, there seems to be consensus that Lady Hamilton is not k
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emma Lyon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Requested move 14 May 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. While there was some doubt expressed as to the primary topic, there seems to be consensus that Lady Hamilton is not known by this name, and a hatnote is sufficient — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:16, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Emma Lyon (poet) → Emma Lyon – Remove "(poet)". Kyuko (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Discuss this first. The target was pointing to Emma, Lady Hamilton until changed by the proposer two minutes before posting here. Timrollpickering (Talk) 12:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Kyuko and Timrollpickering: Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Looking at Emma, Lady Hamilton it seems she was born Amy Lyon and later known as Emma Hart, but not it seems Emma Lyon. In any case, no other use of the name on Wikipedia. A hatnote is more than sufficient. PC78 (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support. While Lady Hamilton's birth name was Emma Lyon, she is rarely referred to as such. For conciseness, I'm convinced the title of Emma Lyon (the poet)'s article should simply be "Emma Lyon" (the name by which she is known and under which she published), with a hatnote linking to the Lady Hamilton article. Kyuko (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Kyuko, nom doesn't normally support own proposal, you are the creator of this new article (for which thanks, it's a notable poetry bio) and the nom here. But did you check GBooks before this technical request? How do you justify this move on the basis of the two criteria for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC..? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and PC78. No need for WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT when a hatnote is enough. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, restore WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Nelson's mistress. See "Emma Lyons was" test in GBooks. @Timrollpickering: thanks for having intervened, there is no case whatsover for the poetess to be WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, fails by a long stretch on both criteria. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Disambiguate Emma Lyon. Emma, Lady Hamilton is quite a bit more important of a historical figure than Emma Lyon (poet), but "Emma Lyon" is the most common name for the poet while it isn't for Lord Nelson's mistress, a factor which weighs in the other direction. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Emma Hamilton is overwhelmingly known as... Emma Hamilton! A hatnote is sufficient. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.