Talk:Edward Rose

Hey, any help anyone could give with this article would be appreciated, especially cleaning up my writing or adding new material. Just a few things I couldn't (

Talk:Edward Rose

Untitled

Hey, any help anyone could give with this article would be appreciated, especially cleaning up my writing or adding new material. Just a few things I couldn't (or didn't) put on the page.

First, the Who's Who I cited for his time at the Sunday Times says he was their critic until 1896, but this New York Times article from 1897 says he's still the critic. As it's more contemporaneous, I trust it.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:f2booOnrBEAJ:query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html%3Fres%3DF60914FA3B5F12738DDDAF0A94D9405B828CF1D3+site:nytimes.com+first+review+%22edward+rose%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Second, Zenda ran in America first, at the Castle Square Theater. That was sometime in 1895, but I can't find the dates.

Third, Edward Everett Rose may have been Canadian, not American. I'm pretty sure he lived in both places, though.

Fourth, although the British Rose is often referred to as Edward E. Rose, I can find no contemporaneous accounts that call him that. I think it's only happened later, by confusion with Everett, who was called Edward E. Rose during his life. I can't say this in the article, though, as I have no source.

Thanks! The Luizer (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, we may need a disambiguation page. Everett probably deserves his own page, and there's also a decently well-known American Indian named Edward Rose. The Luizer (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.