Talk:Editorial
I've moved the original Editorial article to Opinion piece and created a new article Editorial from some pieces of the old one. For the original talk page of th
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Old Editorial article moved to new title
I've moved the original Editorial article to Opinion piece and created a new article Editorial from some pieces of the old one. For the original talk page of the Editorial article, see Talk:Opinion piece. --Lambiam 13:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Editorial tone
My teacher says editorials contain little colloquial language. But can anyone cite that. BTW I think the worldwideview is ok. Kayau Voting IS evil 05:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Editorial Sample?
Should we add some sample editorials? That way the reader could see a sample of what an editorial really is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigabyte Giant (talk • contribs) 19:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- yes, and also their characteristics ~2026-38456-5 (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
"Editorial" is not American English
In the article lead, it says "editorial" is American English -- but I disagree. I think it is a lot more common in the UK than the terms "leading article" or "leader", which I hadn't heard of until now (though I can find examples of them, such as The Economist, which use "leader"). Some examples of newspapers that use "editorial" include The Guardian, The Observer and Reuters.—Profzed! 18:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have edited the article to not describe "editorial" as belonging to any national variety. My edit can be seen here.—Profzed! 18:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- To add to my point, Cambridge Dictionairy don't consider "editorial" to belong to any national variety either.—Profzed! 22:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.