The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be m
| Ed Policy has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| Ed Policy is part of the Green Bay Packers presidents series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Ed Policy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 23:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: OceanGunfish (talk · contribs) 23:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article! I am trying to gain more experience as a GAN reviewer so please let me know if anything I do is nonstandard. I do see from your talk page that you are on vacation through July 1 so I will not anticipate seeing any updates until after that date.
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Reference spot-checks: 7, 8, 9, 15, 22, 25 OK
| |
| 2c. it contains no original research. | ||
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
Earwig score is 37.9%, indicating Violation unlikely. It mostly picks up his various job titles as well as a couple passages that are properly quoted. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
No image. Hopefully we can get one after he takes his next, higher-profile position. | |
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
| 7. Overall assessment. | Pending | |
Just a few little things to take a look at. Thank you for your contributions. OceanGunfish (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 01:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.