Talk:ENAIRE

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Spain This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of Head office, Arturo Soria, 109. 28043, Madrid be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Madrid may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites.

Upload

I know that it has been said that Glasgow International (GLA) is owned by BAA, but: 1. It isn't in Spain (Or Spanish governed areas) 2. Aena doesn't own or manage GLA in any way. (This is done by BAA)

If the airport is so valuable to Spain / Aena: 1. A reason, please and 2. Wouldn't you think a larger airport like CDG, JFK or LHR more valuable? (Please remember GLA is the second largest in Scotland, (EDI is largest by passengers and aircraft).

Sorry about all this, but it just seems stupid to me (and hopefully some of you) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan10ad (talk • contribs) 15:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, there is no way that Glasgow should be on this list. The reference was added by 92.3.62.240 and looking at their history a lot of their edits has been vandalism. I will remove the references to Glasgow. Calumuist (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm updating the article with 2008 traffic data ([1]). Glasgow is not in the list :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etnacila (talk • contribs) 22:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/malaga/

  Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ENAIRE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100102065204/http://europeforvisitors.com/europe/news/spain-barcelona-airport-terminal-t1.htm to http://europeforvisitors.com/europe/news/spain-barcelona-airport-terminal-t1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ENAIRE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100626093728/http://www.nytimes.com:80/2006/10/16/arts/16arts.html to http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/16/arts/16arts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why is there no article about AENA. I believe it constitutes one since it is one of the world's largest airport managers, and all that it shows here are the logos. It should be noted that an AENA article is available in 13 other languages. Mind the gap 1 (talk) 23:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply