Talk:E-captioning

I do understand that the term "eCaptioning" may not meet notability standards, mostly because the process is known by some other names, with several companies h

I do understand that the term "eCaptioning" may not meet notability standards, mostly because the process is known by some other names, with several companies having their own branding for the same technology. It is definitely a major technology in use by major movie & TV studios, most closed captioning companies, etc.

Would this article be more appropriate as a sub-section of the general closed captioning article? Even if it doesn't deserve it's own article, I think this information is extremely useful to anyone who wants to know how closed captioning is added to video. The main closed captioning article talks about it more from a viewer's perspective than from a content producer's.

Jettoblack (talk) 03:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • The problem is that there seem to be very little reliable sources--I can find no hits in Google News, for instance, for the term; the only thing that popped up, if I remember correctly, was some company called eCaption. Provide reliable sources and the question will never come up again. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Here are some links about eCaptioning, I don't know if this is enough qualification for notability, but I hope it helps:
Apple, Inc. Seminar on eCaptioning: http://www.seminars.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/ASPRegistration.woa/wa/eventDetails?eventid=93282
Computer Prompting & Captioning Co. home page: http://www.cpcweb.com/e-captioning/
Jettoblack (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I went to a e-captioning seminar at Apple in Reston, VA which talked about all the different workflows. Schools and other educational facilities attended. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18hands (talk • contribs) 21:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.