Seriously. Without an explanation what E's are and who the characters are or what the situation is to begin with the whole section is useless and definitly not
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Seriously. Without an explanation what E's are and who the characters are or what the situation is to begin with the whole section is useless and definitly not a good source on information. Heinrich k (talk) 11:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Dead link
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
I can see no valid reason for the manga and anime to have separate articles, so it stands to reason that this article really needs a massive clean up of plot and an overhaul to more fully cover both works. However, there is also a question of which name the article should use. The manga's name is E'S, all caps. As is the primary work and is licensed and has been fully released in English, the MOS would seem to indicate that this article should be moved to that name and the lead and infoboxes adjusted accordingly. The capitalization guide, however, may dictate that the name be set as E's instead, unless E'S is a proper noun? Thoughts?
All the sources I've found say the official manga title is E'S in both Japanese and English. The capitalization guide does recognize that some trade names (and a title is one, though it is not trademarked as such) have wonky capitalizations (iPod, anyone?). Using common sense, as the primary source, the article should be moved to E'S and refactored to initially focus on the manga. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Only the case in which the prefixes "e" or "i" are lowercase are recognized as exceptions under MOS-TM (and WP:MOS-JA#Titles of books, CDs, movies, etc. to be specific), though, and my common sense is telling me that the "'S" is a possessive apostrophe. I would go with E's, unless it's shown to be pronounced as a stand-alone "S". —tan³tx03:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Been a few months since I watched the anime, but if I remember correctly, they pronounced it as Es and it was supposed to be short for Espers (no idea where the apostrophe comes in). I haven't read the manga, though, so don't know if the usage there is the same. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 03:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's pronounced kind of like the letter "s" (エス, esu). The Japanese article lists it as "E'S". Per MOS-TM and MOS-JAPAN, I think we should go with "E's". It doesn't really matter if it was supposed to be plural or possessive. --Eruhildo (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on E's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.