Talk:Dundas Data Visualization

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

How is this page so very different from everything else under Category:Software companies? I recommend that it not speedied and go through a regular AfD, if needed.--Standardfact (talk)

You're right, of course--it's very similar to at least half of those entries, but I would say that only implies that those other articles should also be deleted. They mostly read like advertisements or PR blurbs, and even if they didn't they fail the notability guidelines for organizations. But if you would like to switch this to a regular AfD, please do so. Instead though, I would recommend marking those other similar articles for deletion. Ohspite (talk) 02:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

All of these were sitting in the "references" section. They can be used to improve the article, right now they are just external link.

• "Dundas Data Visualization, Inc. Company Overview" "Bloomberg Businessweek"
• "Niche and Complementary BI Products' "BIScorecard"
• "Airline Operations Executive Dashboard KPIs for Sales, Operations and Financials from Dundas" "Dashboards By Example", March 3, 2007.
• "Bridging the Gap Between Data and Developers", "Microsoft News Center", June 4, 2007.
• "Profit 100 Canada's Fastest-Growing Companies #97" Canadian Business Online
• "Latest White Papers in Graphics Components by Dundas Data Visualization", "Silicon.com", April 29, 2008.
• "Dundas Project Management Dashboard", "Dashboards By Example", September 25, 2008.
• "43 Canadian companies named to the 2008 Deloitte Technology Fast 500" "Deloitte", November 12, 2008.
• "Developers not needed to build a dashboard with Dundas' tool" "Computerworld", December 3, 2009.
• "Dundas updates Dashboard business intelligence suite", "SD Times", May 20, 2010.
• "2010 Best of Tech·Ed Award Winners" "Windows IT Pro"
• "Digital Dashboard Offers Dev Hooks", "Visual Studio Magazine", October 1, 2010.
• VB.NET Forums Reviews
• Review by Steven Smith of ASPAlliance.com
• "Nexima's Air Traffic Control Solution Takes Flight With Dundas Data Visualization". ZDnet Asia. 2007-06-23. Retrieved 2009-10-05. ^{[dead link]}

--Muhandes (talk) 13:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I used references that were applicable and made edits to the overall page. I still think this company is very notably in the Data Visualization/Dashboard industry..--Martin58474 (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

As I've promised on AfD page, I've completed what I can for cleaning this article up (and removed {ad} tag). Further improvements are obviously very welcome. Ipsign (talk) 06:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ipsign did a great job with this, but over the course of several years single-purpose accounts have added the advertisements back. I tried to remove most of it again. If others see some of the deletions as overzealous, I won't fight notable facts being included again, assuming they're not added by more single-purpose or sock-puppet accounts. Ohspite (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Although they disappeared off of their list of offerings some time ago, Dundas had a number of MFC toolkits that were very useful (and from some of the old magazines I have, widely advertised?). A number of them appear to be available now as open-source as "The Ultimate Toolbox" [1], however I'm noticing some are missing from that list, including their HyperView/HyperScript (which we are still using).Odysseus (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dundas Data Visualization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101119143422/http://backbonemag.com/Magazine/2010-04/Top300-2010/default.aspx to http://www.backbonemag.com/Magazine/2010-04/Top300-2010/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply