This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The UNIX Haters Handbook states that df (obviously circa 1990) fakes the numbers to prevent a disk from actually becoming 100% full, except for root. Is this the case in the GNU implementation (or indeed was it ever the case)? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rossheth (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC).Reply
I'm not sure it's df that does that. A standard option for Linux when setting up filesystems is to reserve a set percentage (usually 5%) for root, but df sort of reports it. That is, I can run df and get /dev/hda6 ext3 66G 62G 407M 100% /home on one line; obviously 407M + 62G != 66G. The difference is the reserved percentage. --Gwern (contribs) 01:22 4 February2007 (GMT)
Gwern is right, most (if not all) Unix like system reserve some diskspace, IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition states:
<percentage used>
The percentage of the normally available space that is currently allocated to all files on the file system. This shall be calculated using the fraction: <space used>/( <space used>+ <space free>) expressed as a percentage. This percentage may be greater than 100 if <space free> is less than zero. The percentage value shall be expressed as a positive integer, with any fractional result causing it to be rounded to the next highest integer.
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The image currently provided is absolutely useless. If shows the screen as a user types in the command. Less than one second (on my setup) it loops to the beginning. It is impossible to see the result of the command. A simple screenshot is what is needed.
~2025-36222-08 (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.