Talk:Developea

Discussions

Talk:Developea


Requested move 8 January 2026

Latest comment: 6 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Developayellidae → Developea – The name Developea is more popular as a rank, also, Developayellaceae is far more popular as a family name. See Adl et al., 2019, Cho et al., 2022, Weiler et al., 2020 and AlgaeBase. Jako96 (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good reasons to change to Developea. I support this. — Snoteleks (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Although this is contrary to the usual practice of covering monotypic taxa in a single article titled at the lowest rank, in this case using Developea as the title seems like a good way to avoid having to choose between a botanical name (Developayellaceae) and a zoological name (Developayellidae). Plantdrew (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 9 July 2026

Latest comment: 23 days ago6 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:21, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Developayellaceae → Developea – This page was moved to Developea with a requested move, but than moved to Developayellaceae without consensus. I support to move it to Developea yet again, as it's the mostly used name. See some sources: Adl et al., 2019, Cho et al., 2022, Weiler et al., 2020 and AlgaeBase. Jako96 (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support I am fine with this decision — Snoteleks (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: The naming convention for monotypic fauna is to use the name for the lowest rank while the guidance for plants is a little more complex but favors the family name. Following either approach would favor the current title, Developayellaceae, but to my knowledge there remains no consensus as to the applicability of those guidelines to organisms such as these. The AlgaeBase link shared lists Family Developayellaceae. Google Scholar appears to give many more hits for "Developea" but a quick scan of the first page of hits reveals many typographical and OCR errors where the author clearly intended to write developed. I have no strong opinion on this but the basis for the proposal is a little unclear to me. User:Plantdrew previously noted that Developea was a good compromise between having to choose either the botanical or zoological name, and that does seem reasonable. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:29, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Ping @Plantdrew since I added the final sentence after signing my original comment. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:31, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Support per my rationale in previous move discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.